Prominent tech firms in Silicon Valley, along with others that together handle over 13 billion financial transactions every year through digital wallets and payment applications, will now be under government oversight, according to the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
The new regulation, finalized on Thursday, will subject this growing consumer service to the same level of scrutiny that banks face, while also safeguarding the privacy of extensive consumer data and preventing fraudulent activities and the unwarranted closure of accounts, as stated by the agency.
These regulations, which were first introduced a year ago to oversee digital services like Apple Wallet, Google Pay, and Venmo, come at a time when President-elect Donald Trump is poised to implement significant changes to the operations of federal regulators once he assumes office next year, potentially raising questions about the rule’s longevity.
“Digital payments have transitioned from being a novelty to a necessity, and our oversight must reflect this truth,” remarked CFPB Director Rohit Chopra in a statement.
CFPB officials indicated that they anticipate the rule will affect seven unnamed nonbank entities that represent 98% of the projected market activity.
Regulatory oversight will involve comprehensive internal evaluations to ensure that companies comply with federal law, a standard that banks routinely adhere to.
Some representatives from the banking sector have expressed support for the initiative, arguing that those offering bank-like services should be regulated in the same manner as banks. However, the Financial Technology Association, which includes members such as Amazon Pay, PayPal, and Intuit, has requested the CFPB to retract the rule, arguing it does not solve any clearly identified issue.
The CFPB noted that the final rule includes considerable modifications from the original proposal. Companies will now be required to process at least 50 million transactions annually to fall under the rule’s jurisdiction, a substantial increase from the previously suggested figure of 5 million.
The rule will now solely address transactions conducted in U.S. dollars, as opposed to the initial indication that it could also encompass digital assets of monetary value utilized for purchases.
In a significant advancement in financial regulation, major tech firms that process over 13 billion transactions each year will now be subjected to enhanced oversight. The U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has formalized a rule that brings digital wallets and payment applications under scrutiny akin to that of banks. This effort aims to improve consumer privacy safeguards, tackle fraudulent activities, and guarantee equitable management of accounts.
The regulation, which targets platforms such as Apple Wallet, Google Pay, and Venmo, marks a shift in recognizing digital payments as crucial consumer resources. CFPB Director Rohit Chopra highlighted the necessity of oversight that mirrors the increasing dependence on these services. Originally proposed a year ago, the measure has seen significant alterations to better define its scope and implementation.
Now, only firms that handle over 50 million transactions annually will be encompassed by the rule, in contrast to the initially proposed threshold of 5 million. Additionally, the legislation will specifically focus on transactions in U.S. dollars, thus excluding digital assets from its coverage. Critics, including the Financial Technology Association, maintain that the rule lacks a definitive rationale, although some within the banking sector support its adoption.
Scheduled to take effect 30 days following its publication in the Federal Register, the rule has ignited discussions regarding its future amidst an evolving regulatory environment. Given the increasing significance of digital payments in everyday transactions, this rule represents a landmark moment for both the industry and consumer protections.
Digital payment applications have become essential to daily commerce, competing with traditional payment options such as credit and debit cards for both online and brick-and-mortar purchases. Many of these services are controlled by some of the largest technology corporations globally. These platforms have seen particularly strong uptake among middle and lower-income users, who increasingly rely on payment apps for regular expenses and money transfers at rates that rival or even surpass cash usage. What initially started as a practical alternative to cash has transformed into an essential financial instrument, processing over a trillion dollars in transactions among consumers and their friends, families, and businesses.
While banks and credit unions providing consumer payment options are subject to CFPB supervisory investigations, numerous large tech firms managing billions of transactions remain exempt. The CFPB has been closely monitoring developments within this emerging sector, which includes tracking consumer complaints and initiating an inquiry into major tech companies and peer-to-peer platforms facilitating popular payment applications.
The finalized rule will empower the CFPB to oversee these companies in critical areas such as:
Privacy and Surveillance: Major tech companies amass extensive data regarding individual transactions. Federal law permits consumers to opt-out of certain data collection and sharing practices and prohibits misleading statements regarding data protection policies.
Errors and Fraud: Consumers have the right to dispute incorrect or fraudulent transactions under established federal law, and financial institutions are required to investigate them. The CFPB is particularly worried about how digital payment applications can be used to deceive older adults and active duty military personnel. Certain widely-used payment apps seem to set their systems up to transfer the responsibility of disputes to banks, credit unions, and credit card companies instead of handling them internally.
Debanking: Because of the large volume of transactions conducted through many popular payment applications, consumers can face significant issues if they lose access to their app without warning or their ability to send or receive payments is interrupted. The CFPB has received reports from consumers regarding the disruptions to their lives caused by account closures or freezes.
Although the CFPB has always had the power to enforce regulations against these companies, the new rule grants the CFPB the capacity to carry out proactive examinations to ensure compliance with the law in these areas and more. Supervision can mitigate harm by identifying issues early on. Furthermore, supervision serves as a vital mechanism for the CFPB to evaluate risks that can quickly arise in this market, including problems from outages and other factors that might lead to millions of consumers losing access to their funds.
In the final regulation, the CFPB made several important modifications from its original proposal. The threshold for transactions that determines which companies require supervision has been raised significantly to 50 million annual transactions. In light of the changing digital currency landscape, the CFPB narrowed the rule’s applicability to only include transactions made in U.S. dollars.
Today’s regulation is the most recent effort to enhance oversight of major technology companies in the consumer financial sector. In 2022, the CFPB cautioned Big Tech firms about their responsibilities under consumer protection laws when employing behavioral targeting for financial services. The CFPB also released a report indicating that funds stored in certain popular apps are not safeguarded by federal deposit insurance and recommended that consumers consistently transfer their money to an insured account. Additionally, the CFPB published studies on the regulations imposed by Apple and Google within the “tap-to-pay” market.
The CFPB Supervision has introduced a supervision technology initiative that evaluates, among other factors, technology and its controls in terms of compliance with federal consumer financial law.
This final regulation marks the sixth rulemaking by the CFPB aimed at defining larger participants engaged in consumer financial products and services markets. The first five rules addressed larger participants within consumer reporting, consumer debt collection, student loan servicing, international money transfers, and automobile financing.
The CFPB’s main goal is to safeguard consumers against financial misconduct and function as the primary agency for overseeing consumer financial protection measures.
Before it was established, as noted on its website, “[c]onsumer financial protection was not the main priority of any federal agency, and there were no effective tools available to regulate the entire market.”
The CFPB has the authority to regulate many financial product and service providers, including those offering credit cards, banking accounts, loan servicing, checking credit reports, and consumer debt collection.
It is responsible for enforcing consumer protection laws, creating regulations, and providing guidance for consumer financial institutions. Additionally, it serves as a resource for consumers to submit complaints regarding financial products and services.
Significantly, the Dodd-Frank Act granted the agency new powers to assess whether a particular consumer financial product or service is unfair, deceptive, or abusive, making it unlawful.
What has the agency accomplished for consumers?
Despite some criticism of its current structure and funding, it has saved consumers money, streamlined the process for seeking redress, and provided clearer, more tailored responses from companies when issues arise with accounts, loans, or credit reports.
“It has transformed the landscape of consumer finance. Overall, it has greatly impacted fairness and transparency,” stated Lauren Saunders, associate director of the National Consumer Law Center.
For example, the CFPB has taken steps against bank overdraft policies. “It can be argued that the focus on overdraft practices has prompted some banks to eliminate or lower their overdraft fees,” said Christine Hines, legislative director of the National Association of Consumer Advocates.
Moreover, it has targeted institutions that burden consumers with unnecessary products, excessive fees, and unjust terms.
The CFPB ensures the financial stability of households by promoting fairness, transparency, and competition within consumer financial markets. Our enforcement powers are among the CFPB’s most effective tools—upholding compliance with federal consumer financial laws and signaling to financial entities and the public that the CFPB remains watchful for consumers’ interests.
When a financial institution, individual, or any other entity under the CFPB’s jurisdiction violates the law, the CFPB can undertake enforcement actions against them. In specific situations, the CFPB may collaborate with other federal, state, or local agencies to investigate misconduct and coordinate enforcement efforts.
In 2023, the CFPB initiated 29 enforcement actions and concluded 6 previously filed lawsuits through final orders. Those orders require lawbreakers to compensate harmed consumers with about $3.07 billion and pay around $498 million in civil monetary penalties.
Digital wallets: A treasure trove of opportunity or risk?
The realm of digital wallets is unquestionably one of the most crucial areas of competition within the global Financial Services sector, with payments being at its core and the wallet’s role in promoting financial inclusion and facilitating a shift towards a cashless society being significant draws.
Due to the extensive and expanding uses of wallets, many conventional interpretations of their functionalities appear outdated, with Juniper Research providing one of the most comprehensive and beneficial definitions:
“It is a software-based system that can function as a storage solution for a user’s payment methods, identity, loyalty, or ticketing information, allowing these credentials to be utilized in a digital setting.”
As the industry rightly emphasizes ‘customer experience’—considered the ultimate goal for success—as a catalyst for innovation, the next stages of the advancement of digital (or e-) wallets are swiftly becoming apparent. Accompanying these developments, as always, are various unforeseen outcomes, the most significant of which are likely to revolve around data, digital identity, and control.
A $12 trillion opportunity
Before delving into this specific topic, it’s helpful to provide some background. The growth in smartphone usage, with over 6 billion users worldwide (according to Statista), continues to support a positive environment, reinforcing Juniper’s predictions that the number of e-wallet users will rise to 5.2 billion in 2026 from 3.4 billion in 2022. For iPhone users, Apple Pay remains the primary choice, while Google Pay tends to be favored by Android users.
To illustrate the extent of wallets’ reach, examining the transaction volume is particularly insightful. Starting from a base of $7.5 trillion in 2022, the most reasonable industry projections suggest that around $12 trillion in transaction volumes will flow through digital wallets by 2026, reflecting a compound annual growth rate of approximately 12.5%.
However, what truly matters in the world of e-wallets, and what will differentiate future leaders beyond the obvious scale advantages held by the global giants? Is it a matter of ‘banks be cautious’ and another encroachment on their conventional customer base? As is always the case with financial services, it’s crucial to factor in regulation and ponder the question: ‘Are the regulators neglecting their responsibilities once again?’
The Dangers of Digital Wallets
Security Risks: While digital wallets offer improved security features, they are not immune to hacking or cyberattacks. Users should select a trustworthy digital wallet provider and take necessary precautions, such as regularly updating their passwords, enabling multi-factor authentication, and safeguarding their login details.
Risk of Fraud: Fraudsters might attempt to infiltrate a user’s digital wallet account and misuse their payment information for unauthorized purchases. Users must remain alert and promptly report any unusual activity to their digital wallet provider.
Technical Problems: Issues such as system malfunctions or connectivity disruptions can hinder users from accessing their digital wallet accounts, complicating payments and fund access.
Limited Acceptance: Since digital wallets do not have universal acceptance, users might face situations where they cannot complete transactions using their digital wallets.
Hidden fees: Certain digital wallets may have hidden charges, including transaction fees, foreign currency conversion fees, or account upkeep fees. Users should carefully examine their digital wallet provider’s fee structure to understand any costs associated with using the service.
Could Digital Wallets Be a Threat to Other Players within the Finance Industry?
The emergence of digital wallets has transformed the financial arena, offering users a rapid, secure, and convenient means to handle their finances.
Digital wallets enable users to save their payment information digitally, simplifying transactions online, in physical stores, or even between peers. As digital wallets grow in popularity, it’s becoming increasingly evident that they could potentially supplant many traditional entities in the financial sphere, such as payment intermediaries and more.
One primary advantage of digital wallets is their ability to facilitate direct transactions without the involvement of middlemen.
This negates the need for payment aggregators, who usually charge fees for processing payments on behalf of businesses. Through a digital wallet, businesses can directly receive payments from customers, eliminating the requirement for a third-party intermediary.
Thus, it not only lowers costs for merchants but also enables quicker and more efficient transactions.
Additionally, digital wallets provide enhanced security for users. Conventional payment methods such as credit and debit cards are susceptible to fraud and hacking, which can lead to the compromise of sensitive information and financial resources.
In contrast, digital wallets employ sophisticated encryption technology to safeguard users’ data and financial transactions, making them more secure compared to traditional payment options.
Aside from enhancing security, digital wallets also provide users with increased convenience. Users can keep various payment methods in a digital wallet and easily switch between them during transactions, which removes the hassle of carrying multiple cards or memorizing several account details and passwords, making buying quicker and more streamlined.
Moreover, digital wallets frequently feature loyalty programs, rewards, and cashback options, encouraging users to use them more often.
The ability of digital wallets to supplant traditional players in the financial sector has already been illustrated in countries like China, where services like Alipay and WeChat Pay have become prevalent. They have largely replaced conventional payment options and are now the norm, at times even eliminating the necessity for traditional banking services.
This same progression is currently observable in various regions worldwide, as an increasing number of users are opting for digital wallets as their go-to payment choice.
Despite the numerous advantages digital wallets hold over conventional payment methods, there are still hurdles to their widespread use. A primary obstacle is the requirement for broad acceptance of digital wallets by both merchants and consumers.
While digital wallets are gaining traction, plenty of merchants and consumers remain unfamiliar with them, often preferring traditional payment avenues.
Conclusion
Compared to traditional cash and card payments, digital wallets offer several benefits, such as convenience, speed, and security. Nevertheless, there are concerns associated with transferring funds to a digital wallet, including security and fraud risks, technical difficulties, limited acceptance, and potential hidden charges.
It is essential for users to carefully assess the advantages and disadvantages of utilizing a digital wallet while taking necessary measures to protect their financial information. As digital transactions rise in popularity, it is crucial for individuals to stay informed and educated about the potential risks and benefits associated with digital wallets.
Leave a Reply